Best Lusha Alternatives
Chrome extension with high per-contact costs
Lusha built its reputation on simplicity - a Chrome extension that reveals contact information as you browse LinkedIn, making prospecting feel effortless for individual sales reps. With over 1 million users, the platform has become synonymous with quick contact lookups and has expanded to include a prospecting platform with search filters and enrichment capabilities. For reps who need occasional contact data and prefer a point-and-click approach, Lusha delivers convenience. But convenience comes at a steep price. Lusha's credit-based model charges $1-3 per contact reveal, making any campaign of meaningful scale prohibitively expensive. A 5,000 contact campaign could cost $5,000-$15,000 in credits alone - before you've even started outreach. Credits expire monthly on most plans, creating pressure to use them even when you don't need data, and the per-seat pricing means team costs multiply quickly. Data quality concerns have grown as Lusha has scaled. Users report that email accuracy has declined, with bounce rates increasing noticeably over the past two years. Phone data is particularly hit-or-miss, with mobile numbers often leading to wrong contacts or generic company lines. International data coverage outside North America and Western Europe remains limited, making Lusha less viable for teams with global ICPs. BookingBomb eliminates these constraints entirely. Instead of paying per contact and still doing all the outreach work yourself, you pay per qualified meeting that appears on your calendar. Our team handles data sourcing from multiple premium providers, verification, personalized multi-channel outreach, and meeting scheduling. You get global coverage, verified contacts, and guaranteed results without credit limits or expiring allocations.
Common Lusha Frustrations
If any of these sound familiar, you're not alone.
Expensive Per-Contact Pricing
Lusha's credit model charges $1-3 per contact reveal, making scale prohibitively expensive. A modest 1,000-contact campaign costs $1,000-$3,000 in data alone, before any outreach begins. For teams running continuous prospecting, monthly data costs can exceed the salaries of the reps using the tool. This pricing model forces conservative prospecting behavior when aggressive outreach is often what pipeline requires.
Credits Expire
Monthly credit allocations that do not roll over create perverse incentives. Teams either rush to use credits at month-end on marginal prospects, or they let valuable credits expire during slow periods. This use-it-or-lose-it structure means you are constantly overpaying - either wasting credits on unnecessary reveals or forfeiting unused allocations that you have already purchased.
Limited Phone Data
While Lusha's email data is reasonably accurate, phone number quality has declined significantly. Users report that mobile numbers are often unavailable, outdated, or belong to different contacts entirely. Direct dial accuracy rates fall below 40% in many segments, making phone-based outreach unreliable. For sales teams that rely on calling, this data gap undermines the platform's core value proposition.
US-Centric Database
Lusha's data coverage is heavily concentrated in the United States, with significant gaps in EMEA, APAC, and emerging markets. European data often lacks GDPR-compliant verification, creating compliance risk. For companies with international ICPs, these coverage gaps mean supplementing Lusha with additional data sources, adding complexity and cost to the prospecting tech stack.
No Outreach Tools
Lusha is purely a data tool - it reveals contacts but provides no capabilities for actually reaching them. You still need separate solutions for email sequences, phone dialing, LinkedIn outreach, and campaign management. This fragmented stack means managing multiple subscriptions, dealing with data transfer issues, and maintaining workflows across disconnected tools.
Integration Limitations
While Lusha offers basic CRM integrations, the connections are limited in scope. Data syncs can be unreliable, custom field mapping is restricted, and there is no native capability to trigger sequences or automation based on reveals. Power users report spending hours weekly on manual data management that should be automated.
Feature Comparison
See how BookingBomb compares to Lusha
Why Teams Switch to BookingBomb
"I was spending $200/month on Lusha credits and still only getting 5-6 meetings. BookingBomb guarantees 15+ meetings at the same budget. Math was easy."
Other Lusha Alternatives
Compare all your options
Apollo.io
More features, cheaper per contact
Accuracy issues, complex platform
RocketReach
Large database, API access
Credit-based, accuracy concerns
ContactOut
Good for recruiters, LinkedIn focus
Expensive, limited B2B data
BookingBombRECOMMENDED
No credits, guaranteed meetings
Full service only
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about switching from Lusha
Ready to Switch from Lusha?
Stop overpaying for underwhelming results. See how BookingBomb delivers guaranteed meetings at a fraction of the cost.